The criteria used for the report (182 countries): Life expectancy, literacy rates, school enrolment and country economies. It must be noted though that this report is based on data up to 2007 (therefore before the global economic crisis).
10 best places to live
- Norway
- Australia
- Iceland
- Canada
- Ireland
- the Netherlands
- Sweden
- France
- Switzerland
- Japan
Full Human Development Report 2009 (list of chapters in PDF format)
Looking at the criteria used to compile the report, it does take quite a materialistic approach to determine 'human' development. One could argue that 'quality of life' is more important than 'standard of living' and how you measure the former is debatable. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, ecological awareness, moral development, recreaton etc. are all factors which could have influenced the rankings.
Also, countries with a very rich upper class but a large lower class (in terms of income) could still appear to have a good 'standard of living' index when in fact, it's not the case.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to leave a Comment!
Please do not post as 'Anonymous'. If you're not registered, rather use the 'Name/URL' option instead.
Name (or nickname) and location is preferred. It simply makes it easier to respond to individual comments. Thanks. :)